sail-world.com -- America's Cup: New report raises more questions on measurement ruckus

America's Cup: New report raises more questions on measurement ruckus    

'Kingposts can be clearly seen in this shot of one of Oracle Team USA’s AC45’s.'    Guilain Grenier Oracle Team USA ©    Click Here to view large photo

A new report released by the International Jury has revealed that there has been further tampering with the measured parts, on the two AC45 catamarans sailed and managed by America's Cup Defenders, Oracle Team USA.

To recap, what should have been a minor measurement incident has escalated into the most serious form of disciplinary Hearing in the sport.

It relates to the finding on July 26, that a builder supplied part, a kingpost, of three AC45's managed by America's Cup Defenders Oracle Team USA, had been tampered with, by having additional weight added to them.

The kingposts, also known as dolphin strikers, are struts that are located under the wingsail and sprit, through which support rigging is run and tensioned to spread structural loads in the AC45's and indeed most multihulls. The AC45's have two kingposts.

The weight discrepancy was discovered by boatbuilders working for America's Cup Regatta Management (ACRM), not members of Oracle Team USA.

Oracle’s AC45 - 5 - was in class when she competed at Plymouth, UK. - America’s Cup World Series Plymouth -  Chris Schmid- Eyemage?nid=113661 Media (copyright)  
The amount of additional weight added was miniscule, and it is equally hard to understand why it would be located outside of the prescribed corrector weight area, however the point is that it was a breach of the Class Rules for the AC45 - which is a one design manufacturer supplied class.

This issue should have been a relatively simple matter of the team identifying the people involved, the circumstances, and providing the Measurer with a full explanation - all within 24 hours. Had they done so, they could maybe have avoided the ignominy of withdrawing from the last four events of the America's Cup World Series, of which Oracle Team USA had won three and finished second in the other.

The issue has dragged on for four weeks, and now the investigatory phase of a Rule 69 Hearing has concluded. A substantial number of team members were interviewed by the International Jury, at a time when they should be preparing for the Defence of the America's Cup.

For a Reuters report on the issue click here

New report reveals further modifications
The latest report shows that the kingposts from both the Oracle boats are different in measurements from the standard part - now in terms of length - as well as weight.

Further, the kingposts on all other AC45's were also measured. Six of these had been repaired and all were in conformity with the ACRM standard supplied Part.

The Measurement Committee says in the latest report: 'The carbon tubes forming the primary component of the main kingpost was found on both OTUSA 4 and OTUSA 5 to be longer than every other main kingpost measured.

'Grinding the carbon in way of the connection with the upper fitting identified a C-plate spacer glued to the top of each tube that had been externally wrapped with carbon tape.

'The Measurement Committee has no record or recollection of an approval for lengthening of the spreader tube as part of a repair having ever been requested. Of the 11 main kingposts inspected, including 6 that had been visibly repaired or reinforced, only the main kingposts installed on OTUSA 4 and OTUSA 5 showed significant variation from their designed lengths of 499mm. '

Oracle’s other AC45’s - 4 - sailing in Francisco - 10 June 2011. They were ruled out of class for the final four regattas in the America’s Cup World Series -  Guilain Grenier Oracle Team USA ©?nid=113661   Click Here to view large photo
The latest report from the Measurement Committee would appear to indicate a greater degree of tampering with a measured boat than had previously made public. The extent of the tampering probably removes the charitable excuse that the use of overweight kingposts were an oversight by the shore team, or people acting in isolation, without full knowledge of the consequences of their actions.

It is now also a little more difficult to understand how those higher up the food chain in the team, could have been unaware of these changes.

Oracle Team USA will have the opportunity to respond to all allegations in a formal Hearing to be held later this week, called by the International Jury, following a period of investigation by the same Jury.

There are other variances on the internal dimensions of the kingposts removed from the Oracle Team USA AC45’s , which have been noted in the Measurement Committee report, and which will also require explanation by the team.

The initial alterations were admitted by the team, after an internal investigation, and one sailor and three members of the shore crew were identified by the team as being involved. However these latest changes were not included in the initial reports released by the Measurement Committee.

Submissions invited
Ahead of the Hearing this week, Parties to the Protocol, (being competing teams and organising authorities) other competing teams have been invited by the International Jury to make submissions on the situation.

The America's Cup Events Authority has also been asked to make a submission on the impact on the reputation of the America's Cup, and the sport of sailing, by the actions which have been admitted by Oracle Team USA.

In Jury Notice 112 paragraph 8 it was directed: ACEA is required to provide a written submission by 12h00 PDT on 28th August 2013 as to what they consider is the effect of the conduct or activity referred to with reference to Protocol Article 60.1 on ‘the best interests of the America’s Cup, or the sport of sailing’ (in particular the words referred to in paragraph 3(i) of Jury Notice JN102). The purpose of this requirement is to provide to Parties prior to the hearing an opportunity to consider such views.

From JN102 paragraph 3i whether OTUSA has engaged in ‘conduct or any activity ... on or off the water, that is prejudicial or detrimental to or against the welfare or the best interests of the America’s Cup, or the sport of sailing, or that may impair public confidence in the honest and orderly conduct of the America’s Cup, any Event, or in the integrity and good character of any Competitor, Official, selected venue, sponsor or other commercial partner of the America’s Cup’;

Clearly with the actions being widely labelled as 'cheating' by many in the sailing and general media it will be difficult for any authority to argue that damage done to the event is minimal. But ultimately it falls to the International Jury to make this assessment.

The calling of submissions from other Parties plus the fact that a further Hearing is scheduled indicates the judicial process is moving from that of investigation (apart from receiving comment on the latest Measurement Committee Report), and is moving into the final phase where those who are believed to be involved are identified, and the penalties, if any, are determined.

All parties are prohibited under the Jury Rules of Procedure from making public or media comment on the situation.

There is no Appeal from the Decisions of the International Jury. However if action is taken under Rule 69 if the ISAF rules, as report is made to the World Body which then considers whether a world wide ban is appropriate. The most severe penalty to be handed down in a Measurement case was 10 years to the owner of a boat, which had illegal ballasting systems.

The full report, including photos, can be read by clicking here?nid=113661



by Richard Gladwell
- 8:10 PM Mon 26 Aug 2013 GMT





Click here for printer friendly version
Click here to send us feedback or comments about this story.
If you want to send this story to a friend, please use link below
http://www.sail-world.com/indexs.cfm?nid=113661

Based on your current download speed Sail-World has delivered large images (660 pixels long side.)  If you would like to see only small images (300 pixels long side) click here .  For medium sized images (500 pixels long side) click here .  If you would prefer to see text only (without pictures) click here

Click for further information on
2013 America's Cup

Related News Stories:
20 Dec 2014  America's Cup: Full CAS report finds both ISAF and de Ridder at fault
20 Dec 2014  America's Cup: Lawsuit against Oracle Racing lodged in San Francisco
19 Dec 2014  America's Cup: Full CAS report finds both ISAF and de Ridder at fault
12 Dec 2014  America's Cup: Oracle crew member's penalty for cheating is reduced
29 Sep 2014  America's Cup: Oracle Team USA's AC72 takes to the streets
27 Sep 2014  America's Cup: Then and now - Coutts on why Oracle won, and the Venue
09 Aug 2014  America's Cup: Former Artemis crew member says danger is being ignored
27 May 2014  America's Cup: Oracle Team USA under stress
23 May 2014  America's Cup: Oracle and Team NZ designers reveal AC72 secrets
22 May 2014  America's Cup: Artemis death verdict 'result of an human act'

Switch Default Region to:

Social Media

Asia

Australia

Canada

Europe

New Zealand

United Kingdom


http://www.sail-world.com/event_images/image/Twitter_logo_small.png http://www.sail-world.com/event_images/image/FaceBook-icon.png  http://www.sail-world.com/event_images/image/RSS-Icon.png

United States

Cruising Northern

Cruising Southern

MarineBusiness World

PowerBoat World

FishingBoating World

 

Contact

Commercial

News

Search

Contact Us

Advertisers Information

Submit news/events

Search Stories/Text

Feedback

Advertisers Directory

Newsletter Archive

Photo Gallery

 

Banner Advertising Details

Newsletter Subscribe

Video Gallery

Policies

 

 

 

Privacy Policy

 

 


Cookie Policy

 

 



This site and its contents are © Copyright TetraMedia and/or the original author, photographer etc. All Rights Reserved.  Photographs are copyright by law.  If you wish to use or buy a photograph contact the photographer directly.
XLXL NEW AUS
LocalAds   DE  ES  FR  IT