Please select your home edition
Edition
Bakewell-White Yacht Design

US Laser trademarks up for grabs?

by Improper Course on 8 May 2013
Lasers at the 2013 ISAF Sailing World Cup Hyeres Thom Touw © http://www.thomtouw.com
The following opinion piece on Laser Trademarks up for grabs? has been provided by Improper Course, a blog which is a collection of the sailing education and adventures of two sailors, Doug Peckover and his wife Pam on opposite ends of the experience and success spectrum. It ranges from the Laser Master Worlds to the local Laser sailing as well as a couple of other dinghies and the occasional keelboat.

Pam writes 'I originally wrote this back in November but took it down the next day to wait for a more appropriate time.

As noted in my LaserPerformance United Unions post, it seems that Rastegar has quite the maze of confusingly incestuous entities. It appears that he lost track and the result is that he may very well have lost some of the trademarks for Laser, Sunfish, Vanguard, Zuma, Red Dragon and Nomad..

As best as we can tell, Quarter Moon Inc. d/b/a Vanguard Sailboats sold several trademarks to Karaya Holdings Limited, an Irish entity, which then transferred the trademarks to Karaya (Jersey) Limited, a Jersey Island entity.

Seems fairly straight forward except that some errors in the transfer to the Jersey entity makes it questionable that the last transfer is valid which leaves everything still in the name of the Irish entity which is now dissolved. Whether or not the errors can be papered behind to salvage ownership of the marks may have to be determined by a court of law.

So, to be specific on the errors, check for yourself. Here is the Vanguard to Karaya Irish assignment and here is the Karaya Irish to Karaya Jersey assignment.

Look closely at the supporting document of the second assignment. It’s just a name change from Karaya Jersey’s former name, Dorsal, to its current name. Did you catch the error? Who cares what the former name of Karaya Jersey is when it is Karaya Irish that owns the trademarks. Note that the assignment was trying to go from an Irish company to a Jersey company and submitted a Jersey name change as evidence of assignment.

Even the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) didn’t catch this error and incorrectly lists Karaya Jersey as the current owner.



So then, being curious, I pulled the publicly available paperwork for Karaya Irish to see if I could determine if they properly conveyed the trademarks to Karaya Jersey which would mean an easy filing with the USPTO to correct things.

What I found was that the paperwork did indeed list the conveyance to Karaya Jersey but they listed the transfer as of January 1, 2009. If you go back and look at the name change document they filed with the USPTO, you’ll see that the name change from Dorsal Irish to Karaya Irish didn’t happen until February 23, 2009. Meaning, it could maybe be argued that the trademarks were conveyed to an entity that wasn’t yet legally in existence.

But then the icing on the cake is that the Karaya Irish entity, which, at present, may be the last entity to hold clear title to the trademarks, was dissolved on October 22, 2010.

That might be a problem. Hard to paper behind something when the conveyance was hosed up and the entity that needs to correct it is dead.

Confused? Easy to see how they lost track of which door the trademarks were hiding behind. Doug drew the diagram above to make it simple. It didn’t help matters that they had two Karaya entities and two Dorsal entities, a pair of each in each country, and in Jersey one became the other but in Ireland they remained separate and then two were dissolved, leaving only one. That’s just plain jacked up.

The Laser marks owned by Karaya that are possibly up for grabs are in the classes of goods that include sailboats and sails. LP has another foreign entity, Velum Limited, that has owns the Laser marks that secures the class of services that includes regattas. And that registration is jacked up too (check it out here).

Most people have heard about the critically received eight year deal view here) that LP secured with the US Inter-Collegiate Sailing Association to use LP manufactured boats exclusively for all national and semi-final college championships.

After securing such a deal, I predicted back in November that the ILCA would be influenced to go in the direction of following through with their fundamental rule change, which they did. I mean from a business point of view, LP has the Laser trademarks and the eight year exclusive deal with ICSA. That seems like a fairly strong bargaining position.

But, let’s think about this. If LP entities don't have clear title to the trademarks, can that be used to invalidate the 8 year exclusive agreement? And, really, LP doesn’t even own the trademarks. I mean, we all know that some how, some way, Rastegar is the ultimate owner but the ILCA’s fundamental rule change rea here) indicates that the manufacturer has to have trademark rights. Legally, LP doesn’t own the trademarks but the ILCA doesn't elaborate on what 'trademark rights' means. But what if the Laser trademarks are totally up for grabs?

Then I found this very interesting post about why trademark holdings companies are a bad idea. Skip down to the section titled: Legal Pitfalls of Licensing through Trademark Holding Companies:

'One of the defenses mounted ... for invalidity is that the licensor holding company doesn’t exercise sufficient control over its licensees. Rather, they argued, control is exercised by the holding company’s parent corporation and the holding company has therefore made a 'naked license.' The remedy for a naked license is for the court to declare that the trademark in question was abandoned by the trademark owner.'



Hmmm...

Original article can be viewed on the

Schaefer 2016 Ratchet Block 660x82Colligo Marine 660x82InSunSport - NZ

Related Articles

Laser Lawsuit - Kirby´s dramatic move
Kirby Inc. increases pressure on LP, ISAF and the ILCA when they asked Court to issue a prejudgment remedy against LP. Kirby Inc. yesterday dramatically increased the pressure on LP, ISAF and the ILCA when they asked the US Federal Court in Connecticut to issue a prejudgment remedy against LP. If this was to be granted as requested LP and its associates would be unable to build Lasers or have anyone else build them for them, while the Courts then could take their time hearing the case.
Posted on 18 May 2013
Kirby files to cancel Laser Trademark and Sunburst Logo for Boats
Bruce Kirby Inc. today filed the below petition to cancel US trademark registrations Bruce Kirby Inc. today filed the below petition to cancel US trademark registrations directed to both the word LASER and the Sunburst logo for boats. According to US Trademark Office records, these US registrations are owned by Karaya (Jersey) Limited based in St. Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands.
Posted on 11 May 2013
Laser Lawsuit - Challenge to Laser trademark ownership
New development in legal battle between Bruce Kirby, the designer of the Laser dinghy and LaserPerformance. Another new development in the widening legal dispute between Bruce Kirby, the designer of the world´s best known sailing boat, the Laser dinghy and one of the Laser builders LaserPerformance (LPE) the builder and supplier of Lasers into UK, Europe and North America, because of non-payment of design royalties.
Posted on 8 May 2013
ISAF and ILCA on thin ice? Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright
Commentary on lawsuit between Laser designer Bruce Kirby, builder Laser Performance and its associates and ISAF and ILCA Extracts from an article written for Scuttlebutt USA by IPR lawyer John Harwood-Bee on the lawsuit between Laser designer Bruce Kirby, builder LPE and associated companies and ISAF and ILCA.
Posted on 6 May 2013
ISAF Laser intervention - Supply problems looming?
The long running dispute now it appears that its likely to threaten supplies of Lasers. The long running dispute between the designer of the Laser dinghy Bruce Kirby and one of the Laser builders LaserPerformance, the builder and supplier of Lasers into UK, Europe and North America, because of non-payment of design royalties is now much wider than ever before and now it appears that its likely to threaten supplies of Lasers.
Posted on 1 May 2013
Laser ISAF ILCA action brings expanded Bruce Kirby law suit
Bruce Kirby Inc. today filed a First Amended Complaint adding claims related to the ILCA Rule Change, the ISAF Reversal In a widely anticipated move Bruce Kirby Inc. today filed a First Amended Complaint adding claims related to the ILCA Rule Change, the ISAF Reversal on the Fundamental Rule change, the apparent new ISAF Plaques and other matters, and adding as a party the owner of the Laser trademarks in Europe: Velum Limited ITM SA (Antigua and Barbuda).
Posted on 30 Apr 2013
It's the boat that matters, not the name
We have had calls and e-mails from around the world asking if there is anything that can be done to save the Laser. In an attempt to rescue the Laser Class from its downhill course of the past few years I have reluctantly decided that a name change, or re-branding is necessary. During the past three or four years dealers have had difficulty getting timely delivery of boats, and in particular, of parts.
Posted on 24 Apr 2013
Laser Legal tangles continue
Major developments with ISAF changing tack, now in conjunction with ILCA moving boldly to remove Kirby´s design rights. Previously ISAF had recognised that LPE were no longer licensed Laser builders and had stopped the issuance of plaques by ILCA. Major developments in the last few days with ISAF changing tack and now in conjunction with ILCA moving boldly to remove Bruce Kirby´s design rights
Posted on 24 Apr 2013
Statement from the International Laser Class Association
Newly designed ISAF plaques available to all the current ISAF and ILCA approved manufacturers of the Laser dinghy in acc ISAF and ILCA have taken steps to assure the uninterrupted supply of class legal Laser brand sailboats around the world. This includes making newly designed ISAF plaques available to all the current ISAF and ILCA approved manufacturers of the Laser dinghy in accordance with the ILCA class rules.
Posted on 24 Apr 2013
ISAF Statement On International Laser Class
ISAF has been named a co-defendant in the legal proceedings filed in the US District Court. ISAF Statement - On 22 March the International Sailing Federation (ISAF) published a statement concerning the Laser Class dispute and proceedings filed by attorneys acting for Bruce Kirby. The legal situation is on-going but ISAF can confirm that: ISAF has been named a co-defendant in the legal proceedings filed in the US District Court.
Posted on 24 Apr 2013