Sail-World.com : More America's Cup letters: The Empire answers back
|
More America's Cup letters: The Empire answers back |
Societe Nautique de Geneve (SNG) has responded to the earlier correspondence from the Challenger of Record, Golden Gate Yacht Club (GGYC). The letter is one of two published on the Alinghi.com website.
In this they touch on the issue of rules and measurement. The reality is that the International Sailing Federation (ISAF) will be appointing the key officials for the event and that it will be conducted under ISAF Regulations and the ISAF Racing Rules.
While there will inevitably be a measurement process, as outlined by Societe Nautique de Geneve, any adverse measure report or discrepancy would be reported through to the International Jury appointed by ISAF.
While SNG are keen to see a multi challenger series constructed for the 33rd America's Cup, the consent of the Challenger of Record is necessary before this can happen, and it is unlikely due to the possible delay in the match that would result, and would impact on the 34th America's Cup - which will be a multi-challenger event.
The Defender also touches on the issue of whether they are permitted to use a 115ft LWL two masted yacht against a 90ft LWL sloop. Many believe that this is in fact the case, and it was really only until Golden Gate YC raised the issue, that it was considered. To support their view, SNG have quoted extensively from the Mercury Bay Appeal case.
That decision stems from the infamous Big Boat vs the Cat Match in 1988, which was the subject of four years of litigation, and which laid the defining ground for many of the issues which have been set down in the current dispute. It would seem that Societe Nautique de Geneve are on fairly safe legal ground (for once) on this point.
In the last sentences of the letter SNG urges GGYC to move into a mediation process, using a Court appointed mediator. Strangely, but not unsurprisingly, the two parties cannot agree to accept a mediator from the suggested list from Justice Shirley Kornreich.
It would seem that it will fall to Kornreich to appoint a mediator. She could do a lot worse, than appoint ISAF, who in turn could facilitate the early appointment of an International Jury to get some traction into the event, and save further Court Hearings and letter writing - open or otherwise.
 | SNG’s America’s Cup key players: Lucien Masmejan, SNG member, America’s Cup committee secretary & Fred Meyer, SNG vice-commodore and America’s Cup committee chairman & Brad Butterwoth (SNG member, America’s Cup committeee vice-chairman). - Carlo Borlenghi- Alinghi © |
The full text of the letter from Societe Nautique de Geneve is as follows:
Mr. Marcus Young Commodore
The Golden Gate Yacht Club
1 Yacht Road
San Francisco
California 94123
USA
26 May 2009
33rd America’s Cup
Dear Commodore,
We are disappointed by your letter of 20th May 2009 which makes plain GGYC's intent to litigate other issues, and its continued refusal to engage in good faith negotiations. Your letter makes several statements that are simply wrong.
We will not endeavor to catalog or correct each of them herein, but instead will highlight a few examples.
1. Customs House Registry
Your assertion that you have 'no further obligation to declare a vessel' blatantly disregards Justice Kornreich's instructions at the conclusion of the May 14, 2009 hearing:
'I am stating right now that ... the deed does require that the vessel conform to the challenge dimensions. If the [Custom House Registry] does not conform to the challenge dimensions, it is this Court's belief,
and my direction, that Golden Gate will be disqualified, and I am directing Golden Gate, in good faith, to abide by the deed, to make application for the [Custom House Registry] as soon as possible and providing it as soon as possible.'
GGYC must provide a Custom House Registry. It must do so as soon as possible. And it must conform to the challenge dimensions in GGYC's Notice of Challenge and accompanying Certificate. Justice Kornreich has already
explained the consequences of failure to comply.
2. Challenger Selection Series
SNG continues to urge you to allow other interested challengers to compete in a challenger selection series prior to the Match which at this stage will be held under the terms of the Deed.
We have indicated to you a willingness to allow additional time to allow such a series to take place, however, if for your own competitive reasons, you wish to maintain the present match schedule, the challenger series can be held beforehand. SNG remains happy to continue with the present scheduled date of the Match.
SNG has been advised by several interested challengers they will be ready to compete in a challenger series with the Match as presently scheduled. Please provide as soon as possible a clear indication whether or not you are prepared to allow a challenger selection series. You are aware that your delay in providing a clear answer to this issue is damaging the prospects of the challengers.
We would counsel that a decision on your part to agree a challenger series would go along way to dispelling the widely held belief that your litigation has been to secure a match and avoid the risk of another loss in a challenger
selection series.
3. Defender’s Yacht or Vessel
Your suggestion that GGYC's designation of a single-masted yacht requires SNG to race a single-masted yacht is mischievous and flies in the face of the New York Court of Appeals decision in Mercury Bay Boating Club, Inc. v. San Diego Yacht Club.
There, the Court explained that:
'…nowhere in the Deed of Gift have the donors expressed an intention to ... require the defender of the Cup to race a vessel of the same type as the vessel to be used by the challenger.'
and
' In this match , however , the deed expressly permits a defense by any type of yacht or vessel, and restricts the actual vessels to be used only by the length on load water- line restrictions applicable to all competing
vessels'
and
'… the deed permits the competitors to both construct and race the fastest vessels possible so long as they fall within the broad criteria of the deed.'
and
'Accordingly, we conclude that the unambiguous language of the Deed of Gift, permitting the defending club to defend the Cup in 'any one yacht or vessel' within the specified range of load water-line length, does not require the defender to race a vessel of the same type or 'evenly matched’ to that of the challenger and does not preclude the defender‘s use of a catamaran.'
76 N.Y.2d256, 267 (1990).
GGYC had the unrestrained freedom to challenge with a yacht or vessel within the permitted range of load water-line lengths specified in the Deed with any number of masts, and with the benefit of the Mercury Bay judgment. The Defender is exercising the same freedom in its defence, and is relying on the terms of the Deed, as interpreted by the Court of Appeals, in designing and building its yacht or vessel.
4. Venue
Your assertion that SNG cannot select a Northern Hemisphere venue other than Valencia unless GGYC consents, is likewise mischievous and misguided. As SNG has repeatedly informed the Court and GGYC, it will select and
announce a Northern Hemisphere venue in accordance with the Court Orders allowing SNG to select Valencia 'or any other location' for the next Cup.
5. Rules and Sailing Regulations
The Deed of Gift clearly and unambiguously states that, absent mutual consent, the races for the America's Cup 'shall be sailed subject to [the Defender's] rules and sailing regulations so far as the same do not conflict with the provisions of this deed of gift....' This is what we told you in our letter of 23rd April 2009. Your efforts to constrain SNG's rights are groundless.
6. Measurement Regulations
As with any regatta including past America’s Cup regattas, there will be a measurement process to confirm compliance of the challenging vessel with the terms of the Deed and that it has the dimensions and meets the
description specified in your Notice of Challenge and in the accompanying certificate, and your customs house registry.
We again urge GGYC to reconsider its decision to wage litigation on all fronts, and agree to meet us on the water where this can be properly decided. To the extent there are issues that need to be resolved in advance, we reiterate our agreement to prompt mediation under the supervision of a Court-appointed mediator, as proposed by Justice Kornreich.
Yours sincerely,
Fred Meyer Alec Tournier
Vice-Commodore General Secretary
and Chairman of America’s Cup Committee
______________________________________________________________________________________
For the latest letter from Circolo Vela Gargnano is as follows:
Marcus Young
Commodore
Golden Gate Yacht Club
1 Yacht Road
San Francisco, California 94123
May 27, 2009
Dear Mr. Young,
Thank you for your letter of May 26.
We have duly noted its content and the reasons which, in your opinion, do not allow a multiple challenger event to take place, namely, the purported lack of the Defender’s interest and your worries about further delays.
For the sake of clarity let us first state that we never claimed that you have 'an obligation' to consider other challengers under the Deed of Gift.
Actually we only stated that, in your capacity as the Challenger of Record, it is within the fiduciary duties of your role to address the issue of how to organize the Challengers' selection and that we would therefore expect you to protect our interests by doing so. As to the merits, it would be improper for us to discuss the grounds of your litigation with SNG which has not involved our Yacht Club.
We are however very pleased to acknowledge that the issue of the Defender’s interest and consent to a multiple challenger Cup in multi-hulls, which you have qualified in your letter, as being a 'prerequisite for having multiple challengers' has, beyond any doubt, now been successfully overcome.
In fact in its letter of May 26 addressed to the Golden Gate Yacht Club, SNG actually indicates that:
'SNG continues to urge you to allow other interested challengers to compete in a challenger selection series prior to the Match which at this stage will be held under the terms of the Deed.
… if for your own competitive reasons, you wish to maintain the present match schedule, the challenger series can be held beforehand. SNG remains happy to continue with the present scheduled date of the Match.
SNG has been advised by several interested challengers they will be ready to compete in a challenger series with the Match as presently scheduled.'
Moreover, in its letter of May 26 addressed to our Yacht Club, SNG plainly represents that 'SNG is continuing to encourage GGYC to accept SNG’s offer to give you and any other interested challenger, the opportunity to compete in the 33rd America’s Cup'
The above is quite self explanatory, and we believe it fully satisfies the prerequisite argument which you have correctly raised
As to the second issue you raised, it is quite clear from our previous correspondence that we were and still are perfectly happy to meet the February deadline so as to keep the present match schedule you have set for the challenge with the Defender. It would actually be improper for us to seek to delay this match which, according to your own words 'should have taken place in July 2008'.
Challengers series can indeed be held beforehand at your convenience.
We assume and trust that all of the above removes the conditions, the prerequisite, the objections and the worries you raised in your letter and that, consistently with your previous attitude, you would now be prepared to discuss the organization of the multiple challenger event without further delay.
On this regard we are prepared to meet at your earliest convenience.
We look forward to hearing from you
Sincerely
Lorenzo Rizzardi
______________________________________________________________________________________
The Italian club is again requesting a Challenger Selection Series to be held to select the Challenger for the 33rd America's Cup. Maybe one solution is to stage such a series, starting on 1 November or 1 December, at a venue to be announced by the Challenger of Record on 1 September.
While those dates are early, time is essential for the selected Challenger to properly prepare for the Match and to repair any damage which has occurred during racing. If held such a series would be over the Deed of Gift course - ie a best of three event.
Organising such a series and possible substitution of a Challenger of Record (a position won on Appeal) is rather a fraught process, and could invoke further delay - again delaying the 34th America's Cup.
A selection series would also give Societe Nautique de Geneve a vital early look at the BMW Oracle Racing's challenger and would be an excellent source of intelligence on that boat, which is not contemplated in the Deed of Gift, unless the match is conducted under Mutual Consent which the 33rd Match is not.
The request from CVG overlooks the fact that they are seeking an accommodation in the 33rd Match, which could be easily satisfied by Societe Nautique de Geneve allowing a multi challenger mutual consent Match, using boats to the 33AC rule, and allowing all 21 teams that were either entered or available previously to ALL compete in a conventional America's Cup series.
by Richard Gladwell, Sail-World.com
7:46 AM Wed 27 May 2009 GMT
Click here for printer friendly version
Click here to send us feedback or comments about this story.
If you want to send this story to a friend, please use link below
http://www.sail-world.com/USA/More-Americas-Cup-letters:-The-Empire-answers-back/57191
Click on thumbnails to enlarge and find more photos:
Click for further information on
2010 America's Cup
Related News Stories:
MORE STORIES ...
|
| |
