ISAF submissions "also include a further dozen submissions for multihull equipment to be considered alongside monohull equipment for the currently approved Events."
Not everyone has welcomed ISAF's new submission with open arms. The UK Catamaran Racing Association's Simon Morgan sent SailJuice this response to the submission, and Simon questions some of the language used by ISAF in this new document.
Here is Simon's interpretation of things:
This is a welcome move in the right direction by ISAF, but it may sadly turn into a public relations disaster, the more closely it is publicly examined, because the leadership's proposal is legally imprecise and open to suspicion of bias, to which its Members have now become highly sensitised.
Firstly, ISAF Members (MNA's) should be congratulated for responding to the public concerns of the sailing community. It is impressive not only how widespread but also how comprehensive are their initiatives in seeking a better solution. They include submissions from 15 countries and 2 international classes on the selection of Events. Should a majority of Council vote in favour of change, but fail to reach the additional two-thirds hurdle that the leadership seeks to impose, (perhaps unnecessary at this juncture) they also include a further dozen submissions for multihull equipment to be considered alongside monohull equipment for the currently approved Events.
Strategically, there are also proposals to ask IOC for an 11th Event and to set up a new Multihull Committee, like Windsurfing. These are from nations rich and poor, large and small and all around the world.
They all should be thanked, especially those who have had to back on their original decision for doing the decent thing in saying, ?sorry we simply did not think about the multihull community because you were politically unorganised.
Having read your lengthy report and listened to the enormous body of public opinion against the Estoril Events decision, we see that you are a significant part of the sport we all love and have organised yourself and we want to find a place for you somewhere in our 'big church'.
But has ISAF leadership got that message?
Remember the November Council Meeting where Charley Cook 'proposed that the voting process could be simplified…by making a slight modification'.
For the rest of this commentary http://www.sailjuice.com/blog.asp?u=http://sailjuiceblog.com/2008/04/07/more-to-this-than-meets-the-eye/!click_here