Please select your home edition
Edition
Southern Spars - North Technology

Gladwell's Line- Oracle walking on eggshells over Jury investigation.

by Richard Gladwell on 11 Aug 2013
Oracle Team USA - San Francisco - 10 June 2011 Guilain Grenier Oracle Team USA © http://www.oracleteamusamedia.com/

With Louis Vuitton Cup in abeyance for a week, the investigation by the International Jury is expected to continue into the measurement issue relating to three AC45's serviced by Oracle Team USA.

The accusation of cheating has been widely bandied around in the media. It is a easy shot, and those who have sat on an International Jury will know that all is often not quite what it seems, and often there is an explanation which is accepted by the Jury.

People are entitled to be stupid (provided they don't affect others), and often exercise this right in sailing and in life.

Sometimes they get pinged for that stupidity - just being picked up is often punishment enough, and their embarrassment is palpable. Sometimes a more tangible penalty is required to be consistent with what has gone before with others for their misdemeanor.

The issue here is not what was done with fitting weight outside the specified correction weight location, but what happened next.

What did the Shore Crew's masters do, when the error was picked up? Were they completely open with the Measurement Committee and the other authorities involved? Or was some attempt at a cover-up attempted?

The actions by the International Jury would tend to indicate that they have some concerns, and the report by the Measurement Committee on Oracle Team USA would indicate that there is more to this than a stupid error by the shore crew.



The difficulty for Oracle Team USA is that the Protocol for this America's Cup Regatta embraces the completed America's Cup World Series events, as well as the America's Cup Regatta, currently underway. Therefore infringements in the ACWS can be carried onto the current Regatta, and into the Cup itself.

The other issue is that sailing, as a sport, is hinged on the principles of Integrity, Honesty and Trust.

Competitors must have the Integrity to ensure that their boat complies with the class rules at all times.

Inadvertently shifting something out of position is one thing. But in Single Manufacturer One Designs, as the AC45's are, altering a labeled part that is assumed by the presence of that label to be in compliance, which would not be checked by the measurers, is a serious matter.

Competitors have to have the Honesty, that if they do infringe a Measurement rule to be completely open - even if that is to their significant disadvantage.

It is not the competitor's place to determine or manipulate the outcome. That is the Jury's function. Be anything less than honest and transparent, the Jury will find out, and then those involved are seriously for the high-jump.

Finally other competitors have to Trust their fellow competitors not to cheat measurement and rules, particularly in areas that cannot be seen.

That is why open dinghy parks are so effective in a self-policing sport in the dinghy classes at World Championship and Olympic level.

There is nothing quite like the disinfectant of transparency.

That openness of venue is not the case with the America's Cup, where team bases are secure, closed areas. The scope for doing something illegal is much higher. But even so the other teams and measurers have to be able to Trust that their Competitor will not do something illegal, as the chances of being caught are very slim indeed, and the penalties are aimed at deterrence.

Without these three principles being in place, we simply don't have a sport, or an America's Cup.

Where to from here?
The approach from this point is expected to be a reasonably wide investigation. The significant fact is that the matter has been progressed relating to a regatta which concluded last April, and involved the addition of miniscule amount of weight into three boats.

Normally the admission of the inadvertent error, and being completely honest and transparent with the Measurers and Jury, coupled with an offer to withdraw from the Regattas would have sufficed and been accepted.

The Jury must have glimpsed fire through the swirling smoke, and realised that there were issues relating to the fairness of the present competition, that needed to be investigated further. And that is what is happening.

The difficulty for the competitors when Rule 69 investigations are commenced, even at the preliminary stage is that it is not a case of innocent until proven guilty.

The Jury must have to hand some reasonably damning evidence, in this case contained in the report from the Measurer, and the competitor has to come up with some fairly solid explanations as to why the Report is either incorrect, or does not apply to them, to escape the Jury's further interest.

As well as the explanations, the Jury will also need to be convinced that there is no coaching of competitors as to their story, no deceit by omission, and that the parties all co-operate fully with the Jury.

The way a Jury can drill down and satisfy itself as to the veracity of the information given is to interview the individual alone, and without support lawyers or others present. The investigation is largely inquisitorial, the competitors don't know the questions or track the Jury is taking, or what has been said before them, or subsequent.

With two lawyers, and a former magistrate on the Jury, there is little chance of being able to maintain a prescribed story line. Additionally the Jury are all experienced at America's Cup level, most at Olympic Games and World Championship level. They will have sat on hundreds, if not thousands of protests, many of which will have had Rule 69 implications. In Protest Hearings, the Rule 69 topic is often raised but seldom proceeded further - which again is why this case is so unusual.

Only a fool would attempt to take the Jury on in this situation, but it is amazing how many do.

One of the first things the individual Jury members will do is to inform an impression, as to whether the team member being questioned, is a credible witness, or not.

If the latter, and that is the impression of them all, then that member will be marked for further attention, often resulting in a more severe penalty.

For Oracle Team USA, the investigation in itself could be highly disruptive, particularly if the Jury elect to interview all Shore and Sailing Crew.

Given the circumstances, it is not the team's prerogative to decide when and whether it is convenient for them to attend, remembering again that this is an investigation which in normal circumstances would not have gone ahead.

This is a serious matter, but one that is capable of being quickly resolved if approached with complete honesty and transparency.

And if you are guilty as charged, then a voluntary confession goes a long way.

Pantaenius - Fixed ValueT Clewring J-classStorm Force Marine 2

Related Articles

America's Cup - Oracle Racing win in Court but with collateral damage
Oracle Racing have had another claim against them by a former crew member dismissed. Oracle Racing have had another claim against them by a former crew member dismissed. Mitchell focussed largely on the circumstances of the matter and introduced into the public arena some interesting documents to support his claims.
Posted on 23 Apr
Terrific battle in Oyster Regatta Antigua finale
On the final day, two of the three Classes were so close that the winners were decided on the last race. On the final day, two of the three Classes were so close that the winners were decided on the last race. Spectacular sailing conditions prevailed with a brisk 20 knots of wind from the south east. Oyster yachts are built to sail the oceans and revelled in the conditions.
Posted on 12 Apr
34th America's Cup - Oracle pumping claims are flawed - Update
Claims that Oracle Team USA broke the manual propulsion rules in the 34th America's Cup are seriously flawed Claims by an American journalist, Bruce Knecht that Oracle Team USA broke the manual propulsion rules in the 2013 America's Cup are seriously flawed. The allegations received considerable airplay in New Zealand on Friday and over the weekend.
Posted on 6 Mar
America's Cup - Another win for Oracle Team USA in California Courts
America's Cup Defender, Oracle Team USA has been successful in its legal effort to swat away another complaint America's Cup Defender, Oracle Team USA has been successful in its legal effort to swat away a complaint brought by former Oracle Team USA crew member, Matthew Mitchell. Mitchell's complaint against his former team was dismissed by a San Francisco Court on Wednesday. The amount of damage/injury claimed was stated as $400,000.
Posted on 12 Feb
America's Cup - No action against Kiwi sailor, but rule changes made
The International Sailing Federation has changed the process for Rule 69 Hearings in line with CAS recommendations One of the Oracle Team USA crew members found by the International Jury to have been involved in boat tampering activities with the America's Cup World Series regattas ahead of the 34th America's Cup has not been further penalised by the International Sailing Federation.
Posted on 19 Nov 2015
America's Cup - ISAF and Cup Jury summonsed by California Court
Five members of the AC34 Int Jury and the Int Sailing Federation have been summonsed by a San Francisco Court The International Sailing Federation, the controlling body for world sailing, and the five individuals who made up the International Jury for the 34th America's Cup have been summonsed by a San Francisco Court, to answer a lawsuit.
Posted on 9 Sep 2015
Dean Barker's Blog - Back into the racing
Five times America's Cup helmsman Dean Barker gives his view on his split with Team New Zealand and life since Writing on his blog at Kiwi Yachting Consultants' websites, of which he is a substantial shareholder and director, five times America's Cup helmsman Dean Barker gives his view on life since Team NZ. This is my first blog for quite some time. In fact since September last year when I was still a part of Team NZ racing in Istanbul for the Extreme Sailing Series.
Posted on 20 Apr 2015
America's Cup- Mitchell fires new salvo at ISAF Jury Officials
Matthew Mitchellhas advised that he has filed complaints of Gross Misconduct against all five Americas Cup jury members Matthew Mitchell, previously a member of Oracle Team USA, has issued a media release advising that he has filed complaints of Gross Misconduct against all five Americas Cup jury members with the sport's International governing body (ISAF). This action follows on from his recent claims about the actions of another team member Simeon Tienpont, now with Challenger Luna Rossa.
Posted on 5 Feb 2015
America's Cup- Oracle crew mate lodges ISAF complaint against Tienpont
Last Friday, former OTUSA's Matthew Mitchell issued a media release stating that he has lodged a complaint with the ISAF Last Friday, former Oracle Team USA team member, Matthew Mitchell issued a media release stating that he has lodged a complaint with the International Sailing Federation over the actions of a fellow crew member, Simeon Tienpont, and inaction by the International Jury for the 34th America's Cup, in San Francisco.
Posted on 28 Jan 2015
America's Cup- Oracle crew mate lodges complaint against Tienpont
OTUSA's Matthew Mitchell has issued a media release stating that he has lodged a complaint with the ISAF Former Oracle Team USA team member, Matthew Mitchell has issued a media release stating that he has lodged a complaint with the International Sailing Federation over the actions of a fellow crew member, Simeon Tienpont, and inaction by the International Jury for the 34th America's Cup, in San Francisco.
Posted on 23 Jan 2015